BEST EVIDENCE TOPIC REPORT
Clean catch or bag specimen in UTI in non toilet trained children?
Manchester Royal Infirmary
Report by Rachel Jenner, Specialist Registrar
Search checked by Shadi Afzalnia, Medical Student
Manchester Royal Infirmary
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A short cut review was carried out to establish whether bagged specimens of urine in children are more likely to be contaminated than clean catch specimens. 316 papers were found, of which two presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses of these best papers are tabulated. The clinical bottom line is that clean catch is a better non-invasive method of obtaining a urine specimen, compared with bag urine, in non-toilet trained children.
In a [non toilet-trained child with suspected UTI] is [clean catch or bag specimen of urine] better at [reducing the risk of contamination and therefore providing an accurate diagnosis of UTI]?
An 18 month old child with fever and vomiting is brought to the emergency department by its parents. There is no clear focus of infection on clinical
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
