COMMENTARY
All that glistens is not gold
Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
Correspondence to:
Professor M Woollard, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, Coventry University, Richard Crossman Building, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK; malcolm.woollard@btinternet.com
Accepted 6 January 2008
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
There is a tendency among pre-hospital and emergency medicine practitioners to be "early adopters". We have a love of gadgetry, perhaps because of our drive to "do" something to the patient at the time of their greatest need, to save them from the worst possible illnesses and injuries, and our occasional but still worryingly frequent frustration at our inability to do so.
This makes us a gift to industry representatives seeking opportunities to have highly motivated clinicians to "trial" new equipment and to share their enthusiasm with others. This enthusiasm is often initiated by the unassailable logic presented by the salesman about why the equipment should work, perhaps supported by carefully selected "evidence". This, however, is more likely to be based on small studies of poor quality, often using animal models or proxy outcomes rather than reliable clinical end points such as objectively measurable changes in morbidity and mortality, particularly
Relevant Article
- Primary survey
- Colville Laird
Emerg. Med. J. 2008 25: 249.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
