REVIEW
Capillary refill time in adults
Imperial College, Emergency Department, St Marys Campus, London W2 1NY, UK
Correspondence to:
I Maconochie, Imperial College, Emergency Department, St Marys Campus, Praed Street, Paddington, London W2 1NY, UK; i.maconochie@imperial.ac.uk
Accepted 23 October 2007
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Capillary refill time (CRT) in adult patients has found its way into modern medical practice in a seemingly haphazard way. Introduced by Beecher et al1 in 1947, it was defined as "normal", "definite slowing" and "very sluggish", correlating with "no", "slight"/"moderate" and "severe" shock, respectively. No numerical values were placed on the definitions. The concept permeated into medical practice when it was revisited by Champion et al2 for their trauma score.
Champion and colleagues2 arbitrarily used a normal value of less than 2 seconds, although this was not based on experimental evidence. Schriger and Baraff3 in 1988 (and via a personal communication in 1987) were unable to uncover any publications at all that defined normal values of CRT and determined that the 2-second limit was based on personal experience only.
There are scant data on CRT in adults and what evidence there is shows little consensus with established practice.
Schriger
Relevant Article
- Primary survey
- Jonathan Wyatt
Emerg. Med. J. 2008 25: 319.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
