EMQ ANSWERS
EMQ answers
551
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
ANSWER 1
In local anaesthesia...
- False. This is a particularly popular topic for small randomised controlled trials that often show statistical but not clinical significance (a difference on the 100 mm visual analogue scale of more than 20 mm).1 The best studies in adults2 and children3 do not show a benefit of buffering lignocaine.
- True. A review of the historical and trial data shows that low-dose adrenaline (1 : 100 000 or less) reduces the need for tourniquets and does not cause digital infarction.4 Only proprietary local anaesthetic–adrenaline mixtures should be used.
- False. They may hurt more and provide less reliable anaesthesia5 even though they have the advantage of less wound edge distortion.
- True. Note topical anaesthesia is less effective on the trunk and limbs.6
ANSWER 2
Regarding wound infection...
- True.7
- False. There is conflicting evidence from small, heterogeneous trials. A Cochrane review8 concluded that human bites warranted treatment but there was insufficient evidence
. . . [Full text of this article]
Relevant Article
-
Emergency Medicine Questions (EMQs)
Emerg. Med. J. 2008 25: 551.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
