COMMENTARY
Competency in the new language of medical education
Correspondence to:
Dr D A Kilroy, Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, Stockport SK2 7JE, UK; darren.kilroy@stockport.nhs.uk
Accepted 24 April 2008
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The chances are that, even within the past week, you have been involved in some discussion of competence. As concepts and as terms, "competence" and "competency" have crept into everyday medical vocabulary to a point where it is difficult to determine how, when and why they first appeared.
This is a real problem, given the importance that has been placed upon "competency" in what I call the "New Language" of medical education. How can we even begin to decide on the value of "competencies" if we dont even know what they are, what they really represent, or what they were first designed to be?
I want to take a step back to look at the roots of "competence", discuss some very real issues in its current usage and propose a new model of terminology which better reflects what we should be aiming for in our teaching and assessment of clinical
Relevant Article
- Primary survey
- Darren Walter
Emerg. Med. J. 2009 26: 1.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
