Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
To SUBMIT an e-letter please go to the abstract/full text of the article and click the 'Submit a response' link in the box to the right of the text. For further help click here.

Electronic Letters to:

C-C Chen, C-F Chong, Y-L Liu, K-C Chen, T-L Wang
Risk stratification of severe sepsis patients in the emergency department
Emerg Med J 2006; 23: 281-285 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*eLetters: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read eLetter] Usefulness of MEDS score for risk stratification of severe sepsis medical patients
François G Brivet, Frédéric M. Jacobs, and Dominique Prat   (16 May 2006)

Usefulness of MEDS score for risk stratification of severe sepsis medical patients 16 May 2006
  Top
François G Brivet,
Head Director
Service de Réanimation Médicale.Hopital Antoine Béclère-APHP.Clamart -France,
Frédéric M. Jacobs, and Dominique Prat

Send letter to journal:
Re: Usefulness of MEDS score for risk stratification of severe sepsis medical patients

francois.brivet{at}abc.aphp.fr François G Brivet, et al.

Dear Sir,

We read with interest the article by Chen et al which demonstrated that a MEDS score greater than 12 may be discriminant for Emergency Department (ED) triage, ICU placement (1). These results of importance are in accordance with those of our group. We prospectively evaluated the accuracy of the MEDS score in 286 patients with documented sepsis admitted into our medical ICU (10 beds) after an ED consultation and we compared it with the performance of the SAPS II score calculated with the worst values of physiologic variables during the first 24 hr of ICU admission. The median age (interquartile) was 69 yr (52.1-78.8), for a median MEDS value of 10 (8-12) and a SAPS II score of 51 (35.7-70). Community-acquired pneumonia was the main source of sepsis (58.6%). In our series, the two scores discriminate well between survivors and non- survivors (in-hospital mortality rate: 32.9%) if we consider the area under the ROC curve which was 0.771 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.714-0.828) for the MEDS score and 0.830 (95%CI, 0.781-0.880) for the SAPS II score. Furthermore, severity of illness, age, and mortality increased when stratifying patients into the five risk groups defined by Shapiro et al (p<. 000.1) (see table) (2). Whereas, Chen et al reported an increased mortality in case of MEDS score > 12 [calculated odds ratio (OR): 4.51], in our population a cut-off value of 10 was already an important predictor of death: OR, 5.4(95%CI: 3.01-9.72), sensitivity 0.475, specificity 0.857, positive predictive value 0.809, negative predictive value 0.562. As in Chen et al cohort, the MEDS score performs well and then may be an appropriate tool in identification of ED patients at high risks of death from sepsis. However, its usefulness should be tested in surgical ICU patients and prospectively evaluated in the ED to decide ICU admission.

Table 1

MEDS scorePatients (n)Age (yr)SAPSIIHospital mortality (%)
0-41944.6 ± 1631.8 ± 16.75.3
5-74450 ± 14.436.9 ± 16.29.1
8-1113765.4 ± 18.652 ± 2027.7
12-155675.8 ± 10.665.8 ± 2150.8
>153078.3 ± 10.977.5 ± 22.676.7

References

1 Chen CC, Chong CF, Liu YL, et al. Risk stratification of severe sepsis patients in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2006; 23: 281-5

2 Shapiro NI, Wolfe RE, Moore RB, et al. Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score: a prospectively derivated and validated clinical prediction rule. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:670-5

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs