rss
J Accid Emerg Med 17:400-402 doi:10.1136/emj.17.6.400-a
  • Best evidence topic report

Vomiting and serious head injury in children

Table 1
Author, date and country Patient group Study type (level of evidence) Outcomes Key results Study weaknesses
*Our calculation.
Gorman DF, 1987, England1 5768 head injuries in all age groups Retrospective case note review Presence of skull fracture More common in vomiting children (p<0.005) Not specific to children
6685 head injuries in all age groups Prospective patient study 7% of all patients vomited Skull fracture is only a proxy outcome for intracranial problems
25.7% of patients with skull fracture vomited
Hugenholtz H, et al, 1987, Canada2 96 children (GCS 13–15) <16 years Prospective consecutive case series retrospective study of case notes over the previous two years Presence of skull fracture with GCS >12 No difference Small sample size
29 children (GCS 8–12) <16 years Presence of skull fracture GCS 8–12 Less common in vomiting children Skull fracture is only a proxy outcome for intracranial problems
Chan KH, et al, 1989, Hong Kong3 12 072 paediatric head injury cases <16 years Retrospective case note review Probability of IC complication with impaired conciousness + skull fracture + 62% if vomiting v 74% if not vomiting Retrospective audit.
Development of intracranial complications manifested during the first 48 hours of injury Probability of IC complication with normal consciousness + no skull fracture + 0.08% if vomiting v 0.14% if vomiting Identification of risk factors is dependant on accurate documentation (which is unlikely)
Probability of IC complication with impaired conciousness + no skull fracture + 12% if vomiting v 18% if no vomiting
Probability of IC complication with no impaired conciousness + skull fracture + 1% if vomiting v 2% if no vomiting
Ando S, et al, 1992, Japan4 147 patients with head injury, all ages analysed by age group Prospective cohort study Presence of skull fracture No difference between children vomiting and not vomiting Small study
Presence of IC haematoma on CT No difference between children vomiting and not vomiting Results not specific to paediatric patients
Dietrich AM, et al, 1993, USA5 324 consecutive trauma patients in an urban childrens hospital requiring CT. Mean age 7.1 years Prospective cohort study Risk of IC haematoma age <2 76/191 patients with no IC lesion had vomited Small cohort, low event rate
10/36 patients with IC lesion had vomited
Risk of IC haematoma age >2 12/39 patients with no IC lesion had vomited
0/3 patients with IC lesion had vomited
Duus BR, 1993, Denmark6 1876 patients mean age 27.5 (19.9 years) Retrospective case note review Presence of IC complication 1.2% if vomiting v 0.2% if not vomiting Intracranial complication not defined. Retrospective All age groups
Schunk JE, et al, 1996, USA7 508 patients aged <18 undergoing CT for head trauma. 179 excluded for decreased GCS, depressed skull space, bleeding diathesis or developmental delay Retropsective case note review Abnormal CT findings 5.5% if vomiting v 3.4% if not vomiting No protocol for CT request, inclusion based on physician request.
Referral bias (major trauma centre)
Arienta C, et al, 1997, Italy8 10 000 patients with head injury aged between 6 and 95 years (median age 31) Prospective cohort study Abnormal CT result 4 of 213 patients with single episode of vomiting had abnormal CT result Not specific to the paediatric population
6 of 14 patients with repeated vomiting had an abnormal CT result Low event rate
Hsiang JN, et al, 1997, Hong Kong9 1360 patients with mild head injury older than 11 years of age Prospective cohort study Radiographic abnormailty in GCS 13 group 4 patients with vomiting v 11 patients with no vomiting (p=1) Not specific to paediatric population
Radiographic abnormality in GCS 14 group 8 patients with vomiting v 16 patients with no vomiting (p=0.68)
Radiographic abnormailty in GCS 15 group 30 patients with vomiting v 93 with no vomiting (p=0.924)
Miller EC, et al, 1997, United States10 2143 patients of all ages with a history of head injury within 2 hours of arrival at the emergency department Prospective cohort study Abnormal CT 15% if vomiting v 5% if not (p<0.001) Not specific to paediatric population
20% if nauseous v 9% if not (p<0.001)
Quayle KS, et al, 1997, USA11 322 consecutive paediatric patients with head injury Prospective cohort study Odds ratio for vomiting predicting intracranial injury 1.51 (95% CI=0.67, 3.37) Non-trivial injuries excluded. Resultant event rate for IC injury is therefore increased. Not all patients had the gold standard investigations
All patients had radiography and CT Postive predictive value for vomiting predicting intracranial injury 10.9%
Negative predictive value for vomiting predicting intracranial injury 92.5%
Nee P, et al, 1999, UK12 5416 consecutive patients with head injury, over one year period Prospective cohort study Incidence of vomiting in children 12% Skull fracture is only a proxy outcome for intracranial problems.
Sensitivity of detecting skull fracture if child and vomiting 33.3% Methods suggest that additional follow up data were collected, but it is not reported.
Specificity of detecting skull fracture if child and vomiting 93.3%
Likelihood ratio for child and vomiting* 4.9
Brown FD, et al, 2000, UK13 563 patients aged 0–13 with minor head injury presenting to a paediatric A+E Prospective cohort study Incidence of vomiting 15.8% Only minor head injury patients included. Not all patients were radiographed or scanned. Very few patients with significant intracranial pathology
Incidence of skull fracture <1%
Incidence of skull fracture + vomiting 0%

This Article

Blogs and podcasts

Blogs and podcasts

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EMJ.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.