Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 29 April 2002
- Published on: 8 March 2002
- Published on: 29 April 2002Re: The subjective nature of BETsShow More
Dear Editor
The Best Evidence Topic published in November 2001 on absence of skull fracture failing to predict intra-cranial injury (ICI) as determined by head CT (HCT)[1] has provoked criticism on the methods used to find a clinical bottom line.
Dr Geggie states that he produced a BET on the topic that appears not to contradict the findings of the published result, but that there is perhaps an unaccept...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 8 March 2002The Subjective Nature of BETsShow More
Dear Editor,
I am an avid reader of your Best Evidence Topic reports (BETS) section. In your November issue I was particularly interested to read the BET by Andrew Munroe on skull fractures and intracranial injury – particularly as I had recently presented a BET on the same subject in October.
There were several striking differences between my BET and the one published in November. In particular I fin...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.