Article Text


Delayed asystolic cardiac arrest after diltiazem overdose; resuscitation with high dose intravenous calcium
  1. G K Isbister
  1. Discipline of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Newcastle and Department of Clinical Toxicology and Pharmacology, Newcastle Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Australia
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr G K Isbister, Discipline of Clinical Pharmacology, Level 5, Clinical Sciences Building, Newcastle Mater Hospital, Edith Street, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia;


A 51 year old man took a mixed overdose including 1.8–3.6 g of diltiazem, paracetamol, aspirin, isosorbide nitrate, and alcohol. He initially presented to hospital after six hours with mild hypotension and was treated with activated charcoal and intravenous fluids. Eighteen hours after the overdose he had two generalised tonic-clonic seizures. The patient remained unresponsive with junctional bradycardia, unrecordable blood pressure, and then became asystolic. He was resuscitated with high dose (13.5 g) intravenous calcium and adrenaline (epinephrine). He required inotropic support and temporary pacing over the next 48 hours. This case suggests there is a role for aggressive high dose intravenous calcium therapy in severe diltiazem overdose, particularly with the onset of asystole. It should be considered early in cases of cardiac arrest after diltiazem overdose. The case also highlights the problems with delayed toxicity when whole bowel irrigation is not administered.

Statistics from

Calcium channel blocker (CCB) overdose is relatively uncommon, but has a higher mortality and morbidity compared with other drug overdoses.1 Diltiazem overdose has been reported previously, mainly as case reports2–8 and in a few case series.1,9 In particular, overdose of its slow release formulations may lead to severe toxicity if appropriate decontamination is not started.3 There remains considerable controversy about the treatment of severe CCB overdose, particularly with the use of intravenous calcium.10–13

Here is reported an overdose of slow release diltiazem causing delayed asystolic arrest, and successful resuscitation with rapidly administered, high dose calcium gluconate.


A 51 year old white man took a mixed overdose comprising diltiazem 1.8–3.6 g (slow release preparation), paracetamol, aspirin, isosorbide nitrate, and alcohol. He presented to hospital six hours after the overdose complaining of nausea, vomiting, weakness, and lethargy. He had a past history of ectatic coronary arteries and cardiomyopathy, asthma, bipolar mood disorder, and alcohol misuse.

Examination on presentation revealed: heart rate (HR) 80 bpm and blood pressure (BP) 90/40 mm Hg. He was orientated and cooperative. Cardiovascular, respiratory, and neurological examinations were normal. An electrocardiograph (ECG) showed sinus rhythm. He was treated with 50 g activated charcoal, 3 litres of intravenous crystalloid solution, and 1 g of calcium gluconate. BP improved to 100/50. Salicylate and paracetamol concentrations were not in the toxic range. Whole bowel irrigation was not undertaken. Over the next 12 hours he remained alert and well, with no significant decrease in BP or HR.

Eighteen hours after the overdose, he had two generalised tonic-clonic seizures and remained unresponsive with a junctional bradycardia, HR 43, BP unrecordable. He then became asystolic with no palpable pulses. He was intubated and ventilated while cardiopulmonary resuscitation was started. Over a period of 12 minutes he was given 10 g calcium gluconate as 1 g boluses and 9 mg of adrenaline (epinephrine). He responded with HR 54 (junctional bradycardia) and BP 137/80 mm Hg. Five minutes later, he had a second asystolic cardiac arrest and was given a further 2.5 g calcium gluconate and 1 mg adrenaline (total of 12.5g of calcium gluconate given over 28 minutes). An external pacemaker was attached, and an adrenaline infusion (6 mg/100 ml at 5 ml/h) and a calcium gluconate infusion of 1 g in 100 ml/h were started.

After one hour, calcium was stopped but high dose noradrenaline (norepinephrine) and dobutamine were required to maintain blood pressure, and a temporary pacing wire was necessary to maintain rhythm. There was no response in haemodynamic parameters to glucagon. Severe metabolic acidosis (pH 6.83 base excess 26) and acute renal failure were treated with a bicarbonate infusion and 24 hours of continuous veno-venous haemofiltration. Insulin was required for hyperglycaemic control.

Over 48 hours inotropes were weaned, the acidosis resolved, renal function improved, and pacing was stopped (table 1 presents serial blood parameters). The only other complication was pulmonary oedema. This was initially treated as aspiration pneumonia with antibiotics and oxygen therapy, but radiographical findings were more consistent with pulmonary oedema. The patient was discharged from intensive care on day 5 and discharged himself against medical advice eight days after presentation. On subsequent attendances to the emergency department, he had a normal neurological examination, normal chest radiograph, ECG, and creatinine.

Table 1

Serial biochemical parameters including corrected serum calcium concentrations; 13.5 g calcium gluconate given 18 hours after the overdose


This case illustrates the potentially life threatening effects of slow release diltiazem overdose and the problems with delayed toxicity if decontamination is incomplete or not undertaken. The clinical effects in the patient described were consistent with CCB overdose. The spectrum of CCB toxicity includes hypotension (combination of vasodilatation and negative inotropic effects), bradycardia, conduction abnormalities (sinus node depression and AV conduction block), pulmonary oedema, metabolic effects (hyperglycaemia and metabolic acidosis), and neurological symptoms (lethargy, coma, seizures).1–7,9,14 The pharmacokinetics and mechanism of toxicity have been reviewed previously.5,14

Whole bowel irrigation is being used increasingly in poisoning with slow release formulations.15 Similar to most treatment modalities in clinical toxicology, the evidence for the use of whole bowel irrigation in slow release CCB overdose is based on case reports alone. There is a reported case of two patients who took similar doses of slow release verapamil, where one patient had whole bowel irrigation and developed only minimal toxicity, while the other patient, who did not receive whole bowel irrigation, developed severe toxicity.16 Although whole bowel irrigation has not been proved effective in controlled trials of slow release CCB overdoses, the seriousness of this poisoning and the effectiveness of whole bowel irrigation in previous case reports,16 make it an important consideration for decontamination, until clinical trials are undertaken.

The patient had two generalised tonic-clonic seizures minutes before the asystolic arrest. Seizures have been reported uncommonly with calcium channel overdoses.17 Quezado et al also reported a generalised seizure before asystole in a verapamil overdose.17 It may be hypothesised that the seizures precipitated asystole by causing acidosis and increasing the amount of ionised drug available for channel blockade.

There is disagreement about the use of intravenous calcium in CCB overdose.10–13 Recently published Toxicologic-Oriented Advanced Cardiac Life Support guidelines recommend the use of 1 g–3 g of intravenous calcium as a slow intravenous bolus, only after shock is refractory to other treatments.12 However, there is some evidence that intravenous calcium is a useful first line therapy.16,18 There is one report of an asystolic arrest after diltiazem overdose responding to 2 g of calcium gluconate alone.6

In situations of severe haemodynamic compromise, such as asystole, larger doses may be beneficial.13,16 In the case reported here, much larger doses were administered rapidly, and then repeated after a second episode of asystole, with good response. High dose intravenous calcium, that is, greater than 3 g, has been reported in a number of cases of CCB overdose,13,16,18 but not previously in diltiazem overdose.5

In contrast, in cases of CCB poisoning reporting failure of intravenous calcium, the dose was 1 g–3 g.3,4,8 Failure of high dose intravenous calcium seems to occur less commonly,19 suggesting that a higher dose may be more appropriate in severe poisoning. Proponents of high dose calcium suggest that in cases of failure, the overdose is often refractory to all treatment.1 No serious side effects have been reported despite transient high serum calcium (up to 4.8 mmol/l).13,16,18 Multicentre clinical trials will be required to test the hypothesis that high dose intravenous calcium is beneficial in CCB poisoning because it is an uncommon poisoning.

Although the severe delayed toxicity in this case most probably resulted from inadequate decontamination, his pre-existing cardiac disease may have exacerbated it. However, good outcomes with severe CCB toxicity have been reported in patients with a history of coronary artery disease,6,8 and poor outcomes have been reported in otherwise healthy persons.16,20 It is unclear if continuing the calcium infusion postcardiac arrest would have reduced the amount and time inotropes were required. Previous case reports have suggested that continuing a calcium infusion is beneficial,7,16,18 but a controlled trial would be required to test this hypothesis.

This case suggests there is a role for aggressive intravenous calcium therapy in severe diltiazem (and other CCB) overdose, particularly with the onset of asystole. It should be considered early in cases of cardiac arrest after CCB overdose. The case also highlights the problems with delayed toxicity when whole bowel irrigation is not administered.


Thanks to Dr Patricia McGettigan and Ms Corrine Balit for reading the manuscript. Thank you to Associate Professors Ian Whyte and Andrew Dawson for their comments on the manuscript.

 Geoffrey Isbister attended the patient in the emergency department, wrote and revised all manuscripts and will be guarantor for the paper. Ian Whyte and Andrew Dawson discussed the idea and focus of the case report with the author, but did not read the manuscript. Patricia McGettigan and Corrine Balit read and commented on the manuscript.


View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.