rss
Emerg Med J 2003;20:352-353 doi:10.1136/emj.20.4.352
  • Short report

Is email a reliable means of contacting authors of previously published papers? A study of the Emergency Medicine Journal for 2001

  1. F O’Leary
  1. Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr F O’Leary, PO Box 109, Concord, NSW 2137, Australia; 
 fmoleary{at}bigpond.com
  • Accepted 30 October 2002

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether it is possible to contact authors of previously published papers via email.

Methods: A cross sectional study of the Emergency Medicine Journal for 2001.

Results: 118 articles were included in the study. The response rate from those with valid email addresses was 73%. There was no statistical difference between the type of email address used and the address being invalid (p=0.392) or between the type of article and the likelihood of a reply (p=0.197). More responses were obtained from work addresses when compared with Hotmail addresses (86% v 57%, p=0.02).

Conclusions: Email is a valid means of contacting authors of previously published articles, particularly within the emergency medicine specialty. A work based email address may be a more valid means of contact than a Hotmail address.

Footnotes

  • Funding: none.

  • Conflicts of interest: none declared.

Responses to this article

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.