| Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vale JA, 1981, UK | 158 patients with paracetamol overedose. Mean age: 26 y. 1:2 M, F ratio | Prospective observational | Liver damage: | NSD | No randomisation |
| Methionine within 10 h (n=96) | 7% | Small study | |||
| High risk patients defined as paracetamol level: >300 mg/l at 4 h. | IV n-acetylcysteine within 10 h (n=62) | 2% | 2 of 7 vomited the first dose | ||
| In high risk patients methionine. within 10 h (n=43) | 14% | ||||
| In high risk patients IV n-acetylcysteine. within 10 h (n=33) | 3% | ||||
| Prescott LF, 1981, UK | 104 patients with paracetamol overdose. Mean age 33 y 1:1.5 M, F ratio | Prospective observational | Liver damage: | NSD | No randomisation |
| Methionine. Within 10 h, (n=42) 57% of them were high risk | 7% | Small study | |||
| High risk patients defined as paracetamol level: >300 mg/l at 4 h | IV n acetyl cysteine within 10 h (n=62) 33of 62 (53%) of them were high risk | 2% |
- Best evidence topic reports
Oral methionine compared with intravenous n-acetyl cysteine for paracetamol overdose
Blogs and podcasts
Register for free content
Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of
EMJ.
View free sample issue >>
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.









