rss
Emerg Med J 2003;20:531-534 doi:10.1136/emj.20.6.531
  • Original Article

Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: a randomised comparison of continuous positive airway pressure and bi-level positive airway pressure

  1. A M Cross1,
  2. P Cameron2,
  3. M Kierce3,
  4. M Ragg4,
  5. A-M Kelly5
  1. 1The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  2. 2Emergency Department, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  3. 3School of Postgraduate Nursing, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  4. 4Emergency Department, The Geelong Hospital, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
  5. 5Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research, Western Hospital, Footscray and The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to:
 Anthony Cross
 29 Stawell Street, Kew, Victoria 3101, Australia; antdombluep.com
  • Accepted 7 January 2003

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether there is a difference in required duration of non-invasive ventilation between continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) in the treatment of a heterogeneous group of emergency department (ED) patients suffering acute respiratory failure and the subgroup of patients with acute pulmonary oedema (APO). Secondary objectives were to compare complications, failure rate, disposition, length of stay parameters, and mortality between the treatments.

Methods: This prospective randomised trial was conducted in the emergency departments of three Australian teaching hospitals. Patients in acute respiratory failure were randomly assigned to receive CPAP or BiPAP in addition to standard therapy. Duration of non-invasive ventilation, complications, failure rate, disposition, length of stay (hospital and ICU), and mortality were measured.

Results: 101 patients were enrolled in the study (CPAP 51, BiPAP 50). The median duration of non-invasive ventilation with CPAP was 123 minutes (range 10–338) and 132 minutes (range 20–550) for BiPAP (p = 0.206, Mann-Whitney). For the subgroup suffering APO, 36 were randomised to CPAP and 35 to BiPAP. For this group the median duration of non-invasive ventilation for CPAP was 123 minutes (range 35–338) and 133 minutes (range 30–550) for BiPAP (p = 0.320, Mann-Whitney).

Conclusions: These results suggest that there is no significant difference in the duration of non-invasive ventilation treatment between CPAP and BiPAP when used for the treatment of acute respiratory failure in the ED. There was also no significant difference between the groups in secondary end points.

Footnotes

  • Funding: none.

  • Conflicts of interest: none declared.

Responses to this article

  • The value of ABGs
    • Rachael Boddy,
    • Johanna Feary, Nick Sherwood
    Emerg Med J published online March 2, 2004

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.