rss
Emerg Med J 2004;21:165-169 doi:10.1136/emj.2003.012831
  • Original Article

Developing a rapid diagnosis and treatment centre: estimating impact on hospital resources

  1. R Hardern1,
  2. A Taylor2,
  3. R Shelton1,
  4. A Russell3
  1. 1Medical Admissions Unit, The General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
  2. 2Accident and Emergency Department, The General Infirmary
  3. 3Division of Critical Care and Clinical Support Services, The General Infirmary
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr R D Hardern
 Accident and Emergency, University Hospital of North Durham, North Road, Durham DH1 5TW, UK; richard.hardernndhcnt.northy.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 18 November 2003

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the possible impact on hospital bed occupancy if a “rapid diagnosis and treatment centre” (RDTC) were operational; to determine the number of patients that such a unit should be able to accommodate to avoid delays in transfer to this unit.

Design: Retrospective review of accident and emergency (A&E) department notes from consecutive adults over a 16 day period.

Setting: City centre teaching hospital with 1330 beds and 105 000 A&E new attendees per annum.

Main outcome measures: Total number of bed days saved per annum (and daily average, assuming no variation by season or day of the week) and the expected occupancy of the RDTC according to the time of day.

Results: The expected daily bed saving was estimated to be 16. Average occupancy was expected to be between six and eight (with little diurnal variation) and a unit with 10 beds would be sufficiently large to avoid delays for 85% of patients transferred there from A&E.

Conclusions: On the basis of a “paper exercise” an RDTC would be expected to be beneficial in terms of bed utilisation; careful evaluation of the effects of such a unit in operation should be undertaken.

Footnotes

  • ↵* (“Bed use” throughout this section refers to beds on wards, and excludes use of RDTC beds.)

  • ↵† Underestimate as fails to take into account diurnal and seasonal variations that may occur.

  • Conflicts of interest: none declared.

  • Results from this study were presented by AT at the Annual Meeting of the British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine at Cambridge, April 2000.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.