Responses

Download PDFPDF
The emerging role of the emergency care practitioner
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Author's Reply: Emerging role comparisons

    Dear Editor,

    As the lead author of this paper I was glad to read the letters of Mason and Bilby who clearly add to the debate of how we should evaluated new and emerging roles.

    To clarify our approach it must be understood that we were collecting data for this study in 2002, examining the role of four of the first ECPs in the country. We were asking the question 'if you change individuals roles (through tr...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Emergency Care Practitioners should not be compared with paramedics

    Dear Editors

    I enjoyed the article by Cooper et al.[1] and was delighted to see some evidence being published outlining the role of the Emergency Care Practitioner (ECP). However, I have some concerns about the study. I was puzzled as to why the authors chose to compare the ECPs with paramedics. The role is entirely different with ECPs being equipped with additional skills enabling them to undertake an in-d...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    There is a lack of other professionals for ECPs to be compared with

    Dear Editor,

    I too enjoyed the paper, "The emerging role of the emergency care practitioner" submitted by S.Cooper et al. I was gratified to see that Suzanne Mason had read the paper and replied.

    My thoughts on the suitability of the paramedic and ECP comparison, however, differ from Dr Mason's. Whilst I accept the comments in her letter with particular reference to the training and education of par...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.