rss
Emerg Med J 21:646
  • Letter

Comprehensive drug screening

  1. H A Greller,
  2. F Barrueto, Jr
  1. New York City Poison Control Center, 455 First Avenue, Room 123, New York, NY 10016, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr H A Greller
 grellerverizon.net

    We read with interest the paper by Fabbri et al on comprehensive drug screening.1 We are concerned by the statement that the “Diagnosis was made on the basis of plasma or urine concentrations of drugs or their metabolites in amounts sufficient to explain the presenting symptoms.” The presence of drug in a screen should imply neither intoxication nor clinical effect, as drug or metabolite may persist for days after toxicity wanes. This is particularly important because many drugs have unique pharmacokinetics, may induce tolerance, or simply do not follow the traditional dose response curve, making the interpretation of a qualitative drug level unreliable. Additionally, it is unclear from the text how the diagnosis and disposition were defined or proved, as no outcome data were presented. It is unclear that outcomes would be changed by the test results, given the poor intraobserver agreement reported.

    Among the substances included in the final analysis, clearly tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) are of greatest concern. However, the electrocardiogram may be a better prognostic indicator of TCA poisoning, and may be a more sensitive indicator of drug presence2 than drug concentrations.3 In addition, it is our belief that acetaminophen is the only drug screen that has been shown to have a clinical impact in intentionally self poisoned patients.4

    The diagnosis and management of the self poisoned patient is centred on a careful history and physical examination. Directed adjuncts such as an ECG and acetaminophen concentration may influence management and disposition. We would caution against the use of broad testing of the self poisoned patient as a guide to medical decision making. Even if this technology was widely available and economically viable, we question its utility as, in most cases, it is unlikely to affect the management of the self poisoned patient.

    References


    Free sample
    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EMJ.
    View free sample issue >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

    Poll now closed

    What impact do you think co-locating primary care services with or within EDs has on ED visits:

    Results:
    Decreased ED visits: 55% Increased ED visits: 28% Has no effect: 17%

    Related review: Primary care services located with EDs: a review of effectiveness >>

    Related editorial: Primary care services located with EDs: a review of effectiveness >>

    Navigate This Article