rss
Emerg Med J 2004;21:724-727 doi:10.1136/emj.2004.016923
  • Prehospital care

Developing alternative ambulance response schemes: analysis of attitudes, barriers, and change

  1. J P Squires1,
  2. S Mason2
  1. 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
  2. 2Emergency Department, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield and Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Mr J Squires
 PO Box 6490, Baslow, Bakewell DE45 1XR, UK; justin.squiresderwentassociates.com
  • Accepted 26 August 2004

Abstract

Objectives: Alternative response schemes for emergency calls are being set up by many UK ambulance services. The barriers to such developments from the perspective of ambulance service staff have not been formally investigated. The aims of this study are to identify attitudes and barriers to the development of alternative response schemes and ways of easing the transition as they are implemented.

Methods: South Yorkshire Ambulance Service crews and control room staff were interviewed, using South Yorkshire’s paramedic practitioner (PP) scheme as a model of an alternative response scheme.

Results: 55 ambulance crew and 17 control staff were interviewed. Most (97%, n = 70) thought that the PP scheme was a good way of dealing with patients who call 999 but may not need urgent transport and hospital treatment. The perceived effect of the PP scheme on traditional ambulance service duties was equally divided between a third who thought there had been no effect, a third who perceived an improvement, and a third a deterioration. Recurrent difficulties with the scheme were found relating to the AMPDS methodology of ambulance dispatch, and ambulance service performance targets.

Conclusions: Flexibility of AMPDS and dispatch targets will need to be reviewed to permit the successful implementation of alternative responses to 999 calls. Careful consideration needs to be given to communicating the aims and value of such schemes to all staff and ensuring a common understanding of, and commitment to, a shared vision. The effect of implementation on the remaining service function must be well planned.

Footnotes

  • * Urgent crews primary role is to transport patients with non-life threatening conditions to hospital, usually having first been seen by their general practitioner.

  • Funding: none.

  • Conflicts of interest: none declared.

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EMJ.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for EMJ. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.