rss
Emerg Med J 2005;22:97-98 doi:10.1136/emj.2002.002626
  • Original Article

Emergency department patients’ opinions of screening for intimate partner violence among women

  1. K F Hurley1,
  2. T Brown-Maher2,
  3. S G Campbell1,
  4. T Wallace1,
  5. R Venugopal4,
  6. D Baggs3
  1. 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
  2. 2Department of Dermatology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  3. 3Department of Emergency Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada
  4. 4Department of Emergency Medicine, McGill University
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr K F Hurley
 Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, 351 Bethune, VG Site, QEII Health Sciences Centre, 1278 Tower Road, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada; kfhurleydal.ca
  • Accepted 10 June 2003

Abstract

Background: Universal screening for intimate partner violence (IPV) in the emergency department (ED) has been advocated by many medical institutions. Policies implemented for IPV screening have met with numerous obstacles. One such obstacle is the perception by emergency personnel that patients might be offended by such screening if they presented to the ED for problems unrelated to trauma.

Objectives: To assess opinions of adult ED patients regarding a policy of universal IPV screening for women presenting to the ED.

Methods: This study was conducted in EDs in Halifax, Nova Scotia, and St John’s, Newfoundland. Patients were questioned as to whether it was appropriate for all women to be asked if they had experienced violent or threatening behaviour from someone close to them. Patients in significant pain or in extremis were not approached.

Results: The data consist of a convenience sample of 514 adult ED patients, aged 16–95 years. Two (0.4%) were excluded from the analysis. Of 512 analysed, 442 (86.0%) answered “yes” to the question, 53 (10.3%) answered “no”, 17 (3.3%) had no opinion. There were no significant differences between the proportion of “yes” and “no” answers in the male and female groups.

Conclusion: Universal screening for IPV of adult female patients presenting to the ED was supported by most patients. Patient objections should not be seen as a reason to withhold questioning on this issue.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.