rss
Emerg Med J 22:195 doi:10.1136/emj.2004.022830
  • Best evidence topic reports

Scorpion envenomation: does administration of antivenom alter outcome?

Table 1
Author, date, and country Patient group Study type (level of evidence) Outcomes Key results Study weaknesses
Sofer S et al, 1994, Israel Children admitted to PICU after scorpion envenomation. Comparison of 52 children given antivenom between 10 July 1885 and 1 July 1989 and 52 children treated without antivenom between 1 July 1989 and Dec 31 1992 Cohort Duration of PICU stay No significant difference Historical comparison. Children treated without antivenom may have benefited from improved supportive care
Duration of hospital stay No significant difference
Full recovery 49 in antivenom group, 52 in control group
Death 2 in antivenom group, 0 in control group
Belghith M et al, 1999, Tunisia Patients participating in a study on the efficacy of high-dose hydrocortisone after scorpion sting. Matched pair comparison of 135 patients given scorpion antivenom in addition to their trial medication Cohort Clinical improvement 50% of antivenom group, 64% control group Retrospective review of patients recruited into another trial. Results not stratified according to hydrocortisone treatment
Prevention of progression of symptoms 13% antivenom group, 10% control group
Duration of hospital stay No significant difference
Death 1 in control group
Abroug F et al, 1999, Tunisia 825 consecutive patients aged 10 or older presenting to a non-teaching hospital emergency department Randomised placebo controlled trial of intravenous scorpion antivenom Clinical improvement 55% antivenom group, 66% control group Trial found to be underpowered to show any difference in mortality as mortality was so low
Prevention of symptom progression 94% in antivenom group, 96% in control group
Hospital admission 13% in antivenom group, 9% in control group
Duration of hospital stay No significant difference
Death 1 in each group
Ghalim N et al, 2000, Morocco 275 patients with scorpion envenomation, 179 of whom were treated with antivenom (IM, SC or both routes) Prospective cohort Effectiveness of antivenom according to sting admission interval Antivenom more effective if sting admission interval <1 hour 90% of patients had only grade I envenomation. No evidence that patients were randomised or that treatment was blinded. Statistical analysis of clinical features unclear. There appears to be a 50% baseline difference in incidence of systemic symptoms between the antivenom and no antivenom groups in favour of the antivenom group
Local symptoms Greater reduction in local pain and burning reported with antivenom
Systemic symptoms Lower incidence of systemic symptoms in the antivenom group

This Article

Blogs and podcasts

Blogs and podcasts

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EMJ.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.