Responses

Download PDFPDF
“See and treat” is great—if you’re a general practitioner
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Targeting the Targets
    • Paul R Atkinson, Consultant in Emergency Medicine
    • Other Contributors:
      • Chris Maimaris, Susan Robinson, Duncan McAuley, Adrian Boyle, Richard Kendall

    Dear Editor

    In his recent letter to this journal, Dan Ellis writes regarding the growth of See and Treat "the public perception of see and treat will be that it is acceptable to come to the emergency department instead of going to your GP".[1] He continues that we in emergency medicine "are trying to persuade the public that only emergencies should come to emergency departments".

    Another key element is...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Puting See and Treat in its Place

    Dear Editor,

    I can only sympathise with the author that primary care medicine does not interest him. The good news is that it does interest some other clinicians.

    In Leeds (West Yorkshire) we are commissioning a new Walk In Centre that will be strategically placed in front of the Emergency Department. There will be no other way to walk into the department, than through the Walk In Centre. In this way, t...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.