rss
Emerg Med J 2005;22:391 doi:10.1136/emj.2003.011460
  • Letter

Is morphine indicated in acute pulmonary oedema

  1. Matthew Hall,
  2. Richard Griffiths,
  3. Bal Appadu
  1. Peterborough District Hospitals, Cambs, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Matthew Hall
 drmatthallhotmail.com

    Recent referrals to our intensive care unit have led us to question the indication for morphine in acute pulmonary oedema. Acute pulmonary oedema is a common, life-threatening emergency. Appropriate prompt therapy can provide rapid improvements in symptoms by reducing pre-load and after-load, or increasing myocardial contractility. Oxygen, loop diuretics, and nitrates are well-established therapeutic options. Most textbooks of acute medicine1,2 also recommend that intravenous morphine (or diamorphine in the UK) is given to “cause systemic vasodilatation and sedate the patient”,2 despite the absence of evidence supporting its efficacy. Treatment with morphine may be associated with respiratory depression in an already hypoxic patient, potentially exacerbating cardiac insufficiency. Respiratory failure secondary to opiates in pulmonary oedema has previously been reported elsewhere.3

    In vivo experiments have confirmed that intravenous morphine results in significant peripheral vasodilatation and reduction in systemic vascular resistance.4 Further studies reveal that these effects are mediated via histamine receptors rather than opiate receptors however,5 and directly correlate with the rise in plasma histamine concentrations associated with morphine administration.6

    In view of the potential iatrogenic morbidity and non-specific pharmacological action of morphine in acute pulmonary oedema, we question the recommendation of its use. There are more potent vasodilators available without the side-effects of respiratory depression. We suggest that it is only used in acute pulmonary oedema, with caution, when analgesia is required in association with acute myocardial infarction. The use of titrated intravenous diuretics and nitrates to promote vasodilatation is preferable.

    References

    This Article

    Services

    1. Request permissions

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Social bookmarking

    Register for free content


    Free sample
    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EMJ.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for EMJ. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.