rss
Emerg Med J 2005;22:450-451 doi:10.1136/emj.2004.016998
  • Prehospital care

What are the beliefs and attitudes of paramedics to prehospital thrombolysis? A questionnaire study

  1. J Humphrey1,
  2. A Walker2,
  3. T B Hassan3
  1. 1Barnsley District General Hospital, Barnsley, UK
  2. 2Accident & Emergency Department, Pontefract General Infirmary, Pontefract, UK
  3. 3The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Alison Walker
 Accident & Emergency Department, Pontefract General Infirmary, Friarwood Lane, Pontefract, UK; alison.walker1virgin.net
  • Accepted 30 July 2004

Abstract

Background: The Ambulance Services have a critical role in the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Paramedic delivered prehospital thrombolysis (PHT) has been proposed. To the authors’ knowledge there has been no research carried out to ascertain the views of paramedics.

Methods: The authors conducted a postal questionnaire study of 250 paramedics in the West Yorkshire Metropolitan Ambulance Service (WYMAS). This included the knowledge of risks and benefits of AMI treatments, and their views on possible paramedic delivered PHT.

Results: 193 paramedics replied (77%); of these 83% felt paramedics could deliver PHT, 67% felt thrombolysis was safe, and only 12% felt that paramedics should not carry out PHT. There was a similar preference towards autonomous PHT (42%) and telemetry with physician directed PHT (46%). 96% wanted a nationally recognised certificate. There were concerns regarding the risks of AMI treatment, with underestimates of the benefits of aspirin, and overestimates of the benefits of thrombolysis. They also greatly overestimated the risks of thrombolysis in terms of extra deaths (71%), and bleeding (90%).

Conclusion: The majority of paramedics in WYMAS responding to the questionnaire supported the principle of PHT. Concerns included the risks of thrombolytic treatment, training, and the medico-legal implications for them as individual paramedics. Models for paramedic thrombolysis for each ambulance service should include the views of paramedics.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.