rss
Emerg Med J 2006;23:2 doi:10.1136/emj.2005.031948
  • Editorial

The four hour target; problems ahead

  1. Geoff Hughes
  1. Correspondence to:
 Geoff Hughes
 Salisbury NHS Trust, Odstock Road, Salisbury, Salisbury, UK; geoff.hughes{at}salisbury.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 24 October 2005

As the target rises, will EDs become nothing more than a queue processing machine?

Nobody likes to queue. Whether in a supermarket, an airport, a post office, or an emergency department, few of us wish to wait too long for service.

The clinical consequences of waiting too long for urgent treatment in an emergency department are all too obvious. The increased morbidity that can result from delayed transfer to a ward after assessment and treatment in the emergency department may be more subtle in manifestation but no less significant or serious. Sensational media headlines, combined with a powerful political agenda, led to the introduction of the four hour target for emergency department treatment, discharge, referral, and admission of patients. From a gentle beginning, with the target set at 90% for all ED attendances, the bar has risen higher and higher, …

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.