Article Text

PDF
Evaluation of low-cost computer monitors for the detection of cervical spine injuries in the emergency room: an observer confidence-based study
  1. M H Brem1,
  2. C Böhner2,
  3. A Brenning3,
  4. K Gelse1,
  5. T Radkow2,
  6. M Blanke1,
  7. P M Schlechtweg4,
  8. G Neumann4,
  9. I Y Wu4,
  10. W Bautz2,
  11. F F Hennig1,
  12. H Richter1
  1. 1Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  2. 2Department of Radiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg
  3. 3Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg
  4. 4Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 M H Brem
 Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Krankenhausstr 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; brem{at}bwh.harvard.edu

Abstract

Background: To compare the diagnostic value of low-cost computer monitors and a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) workstation for the evaluation of cervical spine fractures in the emergency room.

Methods: Two groups of readers blinded to the diagnoses (2 radiologists and 3 orthopaedic surgeons) independently assessed–digital radiographs of the cervical spine (anterior–posterior, oblique and trans-oral-dens views). The radiographs of 57 patients who arrived consecutively to the emergency room in 2004 with clinical suspicion of a cervical spine injury were evaluated. The diagnostic values of these radiographs were scored on a 3-point scale (1 = diagnosis not possible/bad image quality, 2 = diagnosis uncertain, 3 = clear diagnosis of fracture or no fracture) on a PACS workstation and on two different liquid crystal display (LCD) personal computer monitors. The images were randomised to avoid memory effects. We used logistic mixed-effects models to determine the possible effects of monitor type on the evaluation of x ray images. To determine the overall effects of monitor type, this variable was used as a fixed effect, and the image number and reader group (radiologist or orthopaedic surgeon) were used as random effects on display quality. Group-specific effects were examined, with the reader group and additional fixed effects as terms. A significance level of 0.05 was established for assessing the contribution of each fixed effect to the model.

Results: Overall, the diagnostic score did not differ significantly between standard personal computer monitors and the PACS workstation (both p values were 0.78).

Conclusion: Low-cost LCD personal computer monitors may be useful in establishing a diagnosis of cervical spine fractures in the emergency room.

  • LCD, liquid crystal display
  • PACS, Picture Archiving and Communication System

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding: None.

  • Competing interests: None.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.