Article Text

PDF
Patients’ experiences of care provided by emergency care practitioners and traditional ambulance practitioners: a survey from the London Ambulance Service
  1. M Halter1,
  2. T Marlow2,
  3. C Tye1,
  4. G T H Ellison3
  1. 1Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences, Kingston University and St. George’s, University of London, London
  2. 2Community Services Development, London
  3. 3St George’s, University of London, London
  1. Correspondence to:
 M Halter
 Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences, Kingston University and St. George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK; mhalter{at}hscs.sgul.ac.uk

Abstract

Patients’ experiences after receiving care from emergency care practitioners (ECPs) were compared with those after receiving care from traditional ambulance practitioners using a postal questionnaire distributed to 1658 patients in London; 888 responses were received. The responses of patients receiving care from both groups were similar and largely positive. But in two areas (“thoroughness of assessment” and “explaining what would happen next”), the care provided by ECPs was experienced as considerably better. These differences were partly explained by considerably fewer patients from ECPs being conveyed to the emergency department, suggesting that empowering ECPs to explore and explain alternatives to the emergency department improves patient satisfaction.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Primary Survey
    Ian Maconochie