Article Text

PDF
Complementary and alternative medicines versus prescription drugs: perceptions of emergency department patients
  1. D McD Taylor1,
  2. N Walsham1,
  3. S E Taylor2,
  4. L F Wong3
  1. 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  2. 2Emergency Department, Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
  3. 3University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to:
 Associate Professor D Taylor
 Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3050; david.taylor{at}mh.org.au

Abstract

Background: The perceptions of emergency department (ED) patients towards complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) are poorly understood. We assessed these perceptions and compared CAM users with non-users, particularly regarding CAM safety and efficacy.

Methods: This was an analytical, cross sectional survey of ED patients undertaken in a tertiary referral ED. A five point Likert scale evaluated patients’ level of agreement with statements relating to CAM and prescription drugs.

Results: Of 404 patients who were enrolled (participation rate 97.1%), 275 (68.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 63.2 to 72.5) were CAM users (had taken a CAM within the previous 12 months). There were 178 patients (44.1%, 95% CI 39.2 to 49.1) who agreed or strongly agreed that CAM are drug free, and there was no significant difference between CAM users and non-users (p = 0.77). There were 115 patients (28.5%, 95% CI 24.2 to 33.2) who agreed or strongly agreed that CAM are always safe to take with prescription drugs, and there were no significant difference between CAM users and non-users (p = 0.39). Significantly more CAM users agreed or strongly agreed that CAM are safe to take, can prevent people from becoming ill, allow people to be in charge of their own health, can treat the mind, body, and spirit, and are more effective than prescription drugs (p<0.01). Significantly fewer CAM users agreed or strongly agreed that prescription drugs are safe to take (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Considerable proportions of ED patients are CAM users yet are ignorant of the nature and potential toxicities of CAM. In addition, CAM users have significantly different perceptions of CAM and prescription drugs from non-users. The impact of these perceptions on clinical practice needs evaluation.

  • ED, emergency department
  • CAM, complementary and alternative medicines
  • complementary medicine
  • alternative medicine
  • drugs
  • safety
  • toxicity

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • This project was supported by the Victor Hurley Medical Research award.

  • Competing interests: none declared

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.