Article Text

PDF
How accurate are the references in Emergency Medical Journal?
  1. U Y Raja,
  2. J G Cooper
  1. Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 J G Cooper
 Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK; jamie.julie{at}totalise.co.uk

Abstract

Objective: To determine the accuracy of references in Emergency Medicine Journal during 2003.

Materials and methods: All references cited in Emergency Medicine Journal during 2003 were examined carefully, and the accuracy of the citations was checked against reliable electronic and manual resources. References were categorised as correct or incorrect. The errors were classified as minor if the integrity of the reference was not greatly compromised and major if the error severely detracted from the quality of the reference.

Results: Overall, errors were found in 19% of all citations checked (n = 2561), and in 8% the errors were major and markedly detracted from the quality of the reference.

Conclusions: Citation errors reflect badly on authors and the publishing journal and may reflect underlying flaws in other areas of the research published. It is hoped that identification of this problem will lead to attempts to improve the accuracy of reference citation in the emergency medicine literature and to an improvement in the credibility of research in our specialty.

  • accuracy
  • citation
  • errors
  • medical literature
  • reference

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: none declared

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Primary Survey
    Geoff Hughes