Article Text

PDF
Factors that affect the flow of patients through triage
  1. Melinda Lyons1,
  2. Ruth Brown2,
  3. Robert Wears3
  1. 1Postgraduate Medical Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University Department of Anaesthesia, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  2. 2Accident and Emergency Department, St Mary’s Hospital, London, UK
  3. 3Clinical Safety Research Unit, Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology, Imperial College, St Mary’s Hospital, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr M Lyons
 Senior Research Associate, Engineering Design Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ; mnl24{at}cam.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective: To use observational methods to objectively evaluate the organisation of triage and what issues may affect the effectiveness of the process.

Design: A two-phase study comprising observation of 16 h of triage in a London hospital emergency department and interviews with the triage staff to build a qualitative task analysis and study protocol for phase 2; observation and timing in triage for 1870 min including 257 patients and for 16 different members of the triage staff.

Results: No significant difference was found between grades of staff for the average triage time or the fraction of time absent from triage. In all, 67% of the time spent absent from triage was due to escorting patients into the department. The average time a patient waited in the reception before triage was 13 min 34 s; the average length of time to triage for a patient was 4 min 17 s. A significant increase in triage time was found when patients were triaged to a specialty, expected by a specialty, or were actively “seen and treated” in triage. Protocols to prioritise patients with potentially serious conditions to the front of the queue had a significantly positive effect on their waiting time. Supplementary tasks and distractions had varying effects on the timely assessment and triage of patients.

Conclusions: The human factors method is applicable to the triage process and can identify key factors that affect the throughput at triage. Referring a patient to a specialty at triage affects significantly the triage workload; hence, alternative methods or management should be suggested. The decision to offer active treatment at triage increases the time taken, and should be based on clinical criteria and the workload determined by staffing levels. The proportion of time absent from triage could be markedly improved by support from porters or other non-qualified staff, as well as by proceduralised handovers from triage to the main clinical area. Triage productivity could be improved by all staff by becoming aware of the effect of the number of interruptions on the throughput of patients.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding: This work was funded by the Department of Health Patient Safety Research Programme.

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethical approval: Ethical approval was obtained from the Local Research Ethics Committee, St.Mary’s Hospital, London, UK.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.