Article Text

PDF
Intimate partner violence prevalence and HIV risks among women receiving care in emergency departments: implications for IPV and HIV screening
  1. Nabila El-Bassel1,
  2. Louisa Gilbert1,
  3. Elwin Wu1,
  4. Mingway Chang1,
  5. Carla Gomes1,
  6. Danielle Vinocur1,
  7. Theodore Spevack2
  1. 1Social Intervention Group, Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, New York, USA
  2. 2St Barnabas Hospital, Bronx, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor N El-Bassel
 Social Intervention Group, Columbia University School of Social Work, 1255 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027, USA; ne5{at}columbia.edu

Abstract

Objective: To examine (1) the prevalence of experiencing physical, injurious and sexual intimate partner violence (IPV) and (2) the associations between HIV risks and different types of IPV among women receiving care in an inner city emergency department (ED).

Methods: A cross-sectional survey that elicited self-reported HIV risks and IPV among a random sample of 799 women receiving ED care. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the associations between HIV risk and IPV, with covariance adjustment for potentially confounding sociodemographics.

Results: 49.6% of the women reported a history of any form (ie, minor and severe type) of physical, injurious and/or sexual IPV, 15% severe sexual coercion (rape) over life time and 11.8% IPV in the past 6 months. Women who reported engaging in sex with a HIV-infected partner or an injecting drug user (IDU), having multiple partners in the past 12 months and injecting drugs were significantly more likely to have experienced any form of physical/injurious IPV, severe physical/injurious IPV and any form of sexual IPV in the past 6 months. In addition, women with multiple partners in the past 12 months and women who reported injecting drugs were significantly more likely to indicate having experienced a severe form of sexual IPV in the past 6 months.

Conclusion: For many women receiving care in EDs, IPV and several HIV risk behaviours are frequent, co-occurring health problems. HIV testing and routine IPV inquiry in ED settings offer an important opportunity to identify women who are affected by these overlapping epidemics and refer them to appropriate treatment services.

  • CTS2, Revised Conflict Tactic Scale 2
  • ED, emergency department
  • GED, General Equivalency Diploma
  • IDU, injecting drug user
  • IPV, intimate partner violence
  • RA, research assistant
  • STI, sexually transmitted infection

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding: This study was funded by an RO1 Grant (grant # 5R01MH05829) from the National Institute of Mental Health to Dr El-Bassel.

  • Competing interests: None

  • The content presented in this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of either the National Institute of Mental Health, Columbia University or St Barnabas Hospital.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Primary Survey
    Simon Carley