Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

PDF
Airway Scope versus Macintosh laryngoscope: a manikin study
  1. Yoshihiro Hirabayashi
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Y Hirabayashi
 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan; yhira{at}jichi.ac.jp

Abstract

Objective: To compare the performance of the Airway Scope for tracheal intubation with that of the Macintosh laryngoscope for direct laryngoscopy.

Methods: 10 anaesthetists, 10 residents, 10 nurses and 10 students intubated the trachea of a manikin using the Airway Scope or the Macintosh laryngoscope in each of 4 laryngoscopy scenarios.

Results: Within each group of operators, there was no significant difference in the time taken for intubation between the Airway Scope and the Macintosh laryngoscope. However, the overall number of teeth clicks was less in the Airway Scope, and the Airway Scope scored better on the visual analogue scale than did the Macintosh laryngoscope.

Conclusion: The Airway Scope performed as well as and perhaps better than the Macintosh laryngoscope when used on a manikin.

  • AWS, Airway Scope
  • DL, direct laryngoscopy

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Correction
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the British Association for Accident & Emergency Medicine