rss
Emerg Med J 2007;24:553-557 doi:10.1136/emj.2006.043901
  • Original Article

Short stay emergency admissions to a West Midlands NHS Trust: a longitudinal descriptive study, 2002–2005

  1. E Sibly1,
  2. C M Wiskin2,
  3. R L Holder2,
  4. M W Cooke3
  1. 1Birmingham Medical School, Birmingham, UK
  2. 2Department of Primary Care, Birmingham Medical School, Birmingham, UK
  3. 3Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor Matthew Cooke
 Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, University of Warwick, Room A105, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK; m.w.cooke{at}warwick.ac.uk
  • Accepted 17 May 2007

Abstract

Objectives: To describe changes and characteristics in emergency admissions to a West Midlands National Health Service Trust, 2002–2005, with a focus on short stay emergency admissions.

Methods: A longitudinal descriptive study using retrospective analysis of routine admissions data. Admissions were categorised as short (0/1 day) or long (≥2 days) and examined separately using a General Linear Model. Factors favouring short stays as opposed to long stays were examined using multivariable logistic regression.

Results: There were 151 478 emergency admissions to the Trust between 1 April 2002 and 31 December 2005, of which 2910 (1.92%) had no discharge date recorded. Adjusted means showed a 7.76% increase in emergency admissions in winter months (October–January) and a 14.50% increase across the study period. Increases were greater in short stay (34.03%) than long stay emergency admissions (8.38%). Odds of short stays in admitted patients increased by 25%. Higher odds of short stays were also associated with younger age, winter month and medical admitting specialty (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Increases in emergency admissions were greater in short stay than long stay cases. Reasons for this may be both appropriate (increased use of clinical protocols and falling average length of stay) and detrimental (pressure to meet 4 h emergency department target, changing primary care provision). Further research is needed before generalising findings to other Trusts.

Footnotes

  • Funding: None.

  • Conflicts of interest: None.

  • Ethical approval was obtained from Solihull Local Research Ethics Committee in December 2005

    Contributors: ES developed the project, performed data analysis and wrote the first draft of the paper. MWC had the original idea for the study, helped in design and data analysis and reviewed the paper. CMW assisted with study preparation and reviewed the paper. RLH reviewed the statistical methods used. MWC is the guarantor of the paper.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Services

  1. Email this link to a friend
  2. Alert me when this article is cited
  3. Alert me if a correction is posted
  4. Alert me when eletters are published
  5. Article Usage Statistics
  6. Similar articles in this journal
  7. Similar articles in Web of Science
  8. Similar articles in PubMed
  9. Add article to my folders
  10. Download to citation manager
  11. Request permissions

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
 This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EMJ.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for EMJ. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.