Article Text

PDF

CORRECTIONS
  1. David Lockey1,
  2. Keith Porter2
  1. 1Consultant Anaesthetist, London, HEMS, UK
  2. 2Professor of Clinical Traumatology, University Hospital Birmingham; Chairman of the Faculty of Pre-hospital Care

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Following the notification of several errors of the paper by Lockey and Porter (Emerg Med J 2007;24:437–438) the article has been corrected and is printed below. The online pdf has also been replaced. The journal apologises for these errors.

    Prehospital anaesthesia in the UK: position statement on behalf of the Faculty of Pre-hospital Care

    The exact proportion of patients with trauma who require early airway intervention is unclear, but is likely to be relatively small.1 A large proportion of patients who require urgent tracheal intubation do not receive it until their arrival in hospital, which may result in suboptimal care.1 Rapid sequence induction (RSI) with oral intubation followed by maintenance of sedation is the technique of choice in the emergency department, and, where resource and skill permits, in the prehospital phase.1,2 Most UK prehospital practitioners cannot and should not practice prehospital anaesthesia. Those practitioners who do not have competence in RSI or who operate outside an appropriate supporting system may make significant contributions to the management of most injured patients without this skill, and should not be in any way pressured to perform the technique without appropriate training, resource and local support.2 When patients with airway compromise are encountered, oxygenation should be attempted with simple airway manoeuvres, meticulous bag-valve ventilation and rescue devices (eg, the use of supraglottic airway devices familiar to the individual practitioner).

    Individual competence

    Prehospital practitioners should not practise prehospital anaesthesia in professional isolation. Prehospital practitioners should have the same level of training and competence that would enable them to perform RSI unsupervised in the emergency department.3,4 RSI is well recognised as a potentially hazardous intervention, and considerable time has been spent in ensuring that anaesthetists and non-anaesthetists who perform RSI in hospital can do it safely. Standards in prehospital care should be the same. Practitioners should perform RSI regularly and frequently enough to maintain competence. The definition of “regular” and “frequent” is difficult, and the competence of the individual should be assessed by the lead clinician of the prehospital scheme. In the UK, this is likely to require regular in-hospital practice.

    PROCEDURAL SEDATION

    There are occasions when sedation and analgesia are desirable outside hospital to faculty extrication, splinting and other procedures. Concern has been raised in numerous documents and publications about the potential for complications when performed (in hospital) by non-anaesthetists.5 Prehospital sedation should not be undertaken lightly; in critically unwell patients, prehospital practitioners must be aware of the potential of sedation to lead to deterioration and the need for urgent RSI, and should be competent to perform it.

    Local organisation

    The local prehospital organisation (this may be an immediate care scheme, a hospital-related scheme or an ambulance service trust-related scheme) should provide the support to practitioners practising RSI:

    • A named responsible lead clinician who ensures responsible competency-based practice and regular review/appraisal of practitioners.

    • A clinical governance structure, which includes regular case review, audit, an adverse event reporting system, and regularly reviewed guidelines or standard operating procedures.

    • Equipment should be adequate for the purpose and maintained to the same standard as ambulance service or in-hospital equipment. Minimum standards of monitoring should be the same as for in-hospital anaesthesia.6

    • Anaesthesia in hospital should be only conducted in the presence of an appropriately trained assistant. The same standards should apply in prehospital care. The prehospital team that provides anaesthesia should provide an appropriately trained assistant. Paramedics with a critical care qualification or with competency-based training can fulfil this role.

    Summary

    Although early intervention in a small number of trauma patients a desirable,1 poorly performed RSI can result in unnecessary morbidity and mortality.7 The procedure should be only performed by appropriately trained and competent practitioners working in a properly structured prehospital system. A multispeciality working party has been set up recently by the Association of Anaesthetists of UK and Ireland to consider the issues of prehospital anaesthesia in detail, and will submit its report in due course.

    REFERENCES

    View Abstract

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: None declared.

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Linked Articles