rss
Emerg Med J 2008;25:799-802 doi:10.1136/emj.2007.052951
  • Original Article

Recording of vital signs in a district general hospital emergency department

  1. B Armstrong1,
  2. H Walthall2,
  3. M Clancy,
  4. M Mullee3,4,
  5. H Simpson1
  1. 1
    Emergency Department, Basingstoke & North Hampshire Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
  2. 2
    School of Health & Social Care, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
  3. 3
    Emergency Department, Southampton University Hospital Trust, Southampton, UK
  4. 4
    Public Health Sciences and Medical Statistics, CCS Division, University of Southampton, UK
  1. Mr B Armstrong, Department of Emergency Medicine, Basingstoke & North Hampshire Foundation Hospital, Basingstoke RG24 9NA, UK; bruce.armstrong{at}bnhft.nhs.uk

    Abstract

    Aim: To examine and explore factors that may influence the recording of vital signs in adult patients within the initial 15 min and again within 60 min of arrival in the “resuscitation” and “major” areas of the emergency department (ED).

    Methods: A retrospective analysis of recording of vital signs was performed on 400 consecutive sets of notes from adult patients presenting to the “major” or “resuscitation” areas of a district general hospital ED. The effect of staffing levels, triage category and attendances on the recording of vital signs was examined using logistic regression. The main outcome measures were the proportion of patients with all vital signs recorded within 15 min of arrival, the proportion of patients with all vital signs repeated within 60 min of arrival and the outcomes of logistic regression analysis.

    Results: Only 223/387 patients (58%) had all vital signs recorded within 15 min of arrival and only 29/387 (7%) had all vital signs repeated at 60 min. There was a significant relationship between the failure to record vital signs and lower triage categories. There was no evidence that staffing levels or number of attendances predicted the recording of vital signs within 15 min of arrival.

    Conclusion: Recording of vital signs was poor and unrelated to staffing levels or numbers of patients attending the ED. Failure to record patients’ vital signs undermines strategies to detect and manage ill patients.

    Footnotes

    • Confidentiality and anonymity was achieved by giving each patient a unique identifying code.

    • Funding: None.

    • Competing interests: None.

    • Ethics approval: Ethical approval was granted by Oxford Brookes University research ethics committee and the hospital’s clinical audit department.

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Social bookmarking

    Register for free content


    Free sample
     This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EMJ.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for EMJ. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.