rss
Emerg Med J 2008;25:424-427 doi:10.1136/emj.2007.050856
  • Original Article

Why are we here? A study of patient actions prior to emergency hospital admission

  1. J R Benger1,2,
  2. V Jones3
  1. 1
    United Bristol Healthcare Trust, Bristol, UK
  2. 2
    University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
  3. 3
    Academic Department of Emergency Care, United Bristol Healthcare Trust, Bristol, UK
  1. Dr J R Benger, Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK; Jonathan.Benger{at}ubht.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 9 December 2007

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) attendances and subsequent hospital admissions are rising in the United Kingdom. The reasons for this are unclear but may relate to recent changes in primary care and public perception. The actions taken by patients or their relatives before emergency hospital admission, the reasons for these actions and their outcome were determined.

Methods: Adult patients admitted to an inner city teaching hospital with a medical or surgical illness were interviewed using a semistructured questionnaire. Data were collected and analyzed regarding the actions taken before arrival at hospital, the reasons for taking these actions, their outcome and future intentions. 200 patients were interviewed.

Results: Direct attendance at the ED was more common when help was sought by bystanders or persons known only slightly to the patient (p = 0.03). 57 patients (28.5%) attended the ED directly, 45 of whom dialled 999 for an emergency ambulance. Most patients who attended the ED directly did so as a result of the perceived severity or urgency of their condition and there was incomplete awareness of the out-of-hours GP service.

Conclusion: The majority of adult patients who are admitted to hospital with an acute illness seek professional help from primary care in the first instance. Those who attend the ED generally perceive their problem as more urgent or severe, or have an ambulance called on their behalf. The shift towards ED care appears partly driven by changes in general practice and unfamiliarity with the new arrangements for out-of-hours primary care provision.

Footnotes

  • Funding: This study was funded by the United Bristol Healthcare Trust.

  • Competing interests: Both authors are employed by the United Bristol Healthcare Trust, which is an NHS acute trust providing hospital-based emergency care.

  • The study was approved by the Central and South Bristol Research Ethics Committee.

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EMJ.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for EMJ. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.