rss
Emerg Med J 2008;25:428-430 doi:10.1136/emj.2007.054155
  • Original Article

Feasibility of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in young men attending an emergency department

  1. T Sood,
  2. D Sally,
  3. N Spencer,
  4. A Banerjee,
  5. G Hinchley
  1. Emergency Department, Chase Farm Hospital, Enfield, UK
  1. Mr A Banerjee, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chase Farm Hospital, The Ridgeway, Enfield EN2 8JL, UK; ashis.banerjee{at}bcf.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 24 December 2007

Abstract

Objective: To determine the feasibility of screening asymptomatic young men for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a suburban emergency department setting.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: Chase Farm Hospital Emergency Department in Enfield, North London.

Participants: Asymptomatic sexually active men aged 16–24 years.

Methods: A convenience sample of men aged 16–24 years attending the emergency department was offered urine-based screening for Chlamydia at triage. Verbal consent was obtained and first pass urine specimens were tested using the strand displacement amplification technique. Participants were traced by their preferred method of contact in order to be offered treatment within 2 weeks of attendance at the emergency department.

Results: 67 men participated, 64 of whom were tested, 3 returning positive tests. The prevalence of Chlamydia in asymptomatic men attending the emergency department was 4.7%.

Conclusion: Urine testing for genital C trachomatis in the emergency department can identify asymptomatic men in the community who may otherwise remain undetected. It is suggested that this is a worthwhile screening test to offer in the emergency department, providing follow-up for treatment can be arranged locally. There is no requirement for increased emergency department input into these patients over and above introducing them to the screening programme.

Footnotes

  • Funding: Screening was provided as part of the National Chlamydia Screening Programme and no additional funding was received.

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: Ethics committee approval was obtained from the Barnet, Enfield & Haringey Local Research Ethics Committee.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.