rss
Emerg Med J 2009;26:238-240 doi:10.1136/emj.2008.064303
  • Review

On the philosophy of diagnosis: is doing more good than harm better than “primum non nocere”?

  1. R Body,
  2. B Foex
  1. Emergency Medicine Research Group, Research Office, Emergency Department, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
  1. Dr R Body, Emergency Medicine Research Group, Research Office, Emergency Department, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; rbody{at}doctors.org.uk
  • Accepted 12 July 2008

Abstract

Diagnosis is arguably the cornerstone of medicine. Without at least some form of diagnosis the practice of medicine would not be possible. This narrative review explores common philosophical assumptions and challenges the notion that a certain diagnosis can ever be made. The idealistic concept of “primum non nocere” is discussed, and whether the utilitarian goal of achieving “the greatest happiness for the greatest number” is a feasible or preferable alternative is considered. It is concluded that utilitarianism is inescapably intertwined with modern medical practice. Suggestions are presented to further the understanding of diagnostic medicine by embracing its principles.

Footnotes

  • Funding: None.

  • Competing interests: None.

Responses to this article

This Article

Services

  1. Request permissions

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EMJ.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for EMJ. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.