rss
Emerg Med J 2009;26:580-582 doi:10.1136/emj.2008.058552
  • Original Article

Can undergraduate paramedic students accurately identify lung sounds?

  1. B Williams1,
  2. M Boyle1,
  3. P O’Meara2
  1. 1
    Monash University, Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
  2. 2
    Charles Sturt University, School of Biomedical Sciences, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia
  1. Dr B Williams, Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, PO Box 527, Frankston, Victoria 3199, Australia; brett.williams{at}med.monash.edu.au
  • Accepted 3 December 2008

Abstract

Introduction: The accurate identification of lung sounds during chest auscultation is a skill commonly used by healthcare clinicians, including paramedics, when assessing a patient’s respiratory status. It is a necessary skill as it enables confirmation of a patient’s respiratory condition and guides the paramedic to a provisional diagnosis and the implementation of appropriate management. The object of this study was to identify if undergraduate paramedic students from two Australian universities were able to interpret a variety of lung sounds accurately.

Methods: A prospective single-blinded observational study requiring 96 undergraduate paramedic students from two Australian universities to estimate the lung sounds of six audio files.

Results: The findings demonstrated variable accuracy in lung sound interpretation of the six audio files. The lung sound that contained a wheeze was most accurately interpreted, whereas coarse crackles were the least accurately interpreted. Monash University undergraduate paramedic students displayed similar lung sound interpretations to Charles Sturt University undergraduate paramedic students.

Conclusion: In this study undergraduate paramedic students from two Australian universities were found to be inaccurate at interpreting a variety of common lung sounds. The study has highlighted that a greater emphasis needs to be given to lung sound interpretation in undergraduate paramedic education programmes.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: Ethics approval for the study was approved by the Monash University and Charles Sturt University Ethics Committees.

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EMJ.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for EMJ. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.