rss
Emerg Med J 2009;26:583-585 doi:10.1136/emj.2008.067074
  • Original Article

Can middle grade and consultant emergency physicians accurately interpret computed tomography scans performed for head trauma? Cross-sectional study

  1. A Boyle1,
  2. D Staniciu2,
  3. S Lewis2,
  4. A Hugman1,
  5. B Bauza-Rodriguez2,
  6. D Kirby3,
  7. D Scoffings1
  1. 1
    Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  2. 2
    Emergency Medicine, Eastern Region, Cambridge, UK
  3. 3
    Luton and Dunstable Hospital, Luton, UK
  1. Dr A Boyle, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Adrian.boyle{at}addenbrookes.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 10 December 2008

Abstract

Background: There has been an increasing demand for computed tomography (CT) scans of the head following trauma over the past 10 years. This has placed radiology services under pressure.

Aims: This study aimed to see whether middle grade and consultant doctors with no particular training in radiology working in the emergency department could interpret CT scans performed for trauma with adequate sensitivity and specificity to allow safe discharge. The secondary aim was to describe which abnormalities, if any, were missed.

Methods: Study participants were middle grade and consultant emergency physicians. A comparison was made of the ability to identify any abnormality on CT and a clinically important brain injury on CT, compared with a gold standard of a neuroradiology report.

Results: 243 consecutive CT scans performed for trauma were reviewed by 17 doctors, including five consultants. The overall sensitivity and specificity for detecting clinically important brain injuries was 87.8 (95% CI 73.8 to 95.9) and 80.2 (95% CI 75.2 to 85.3), respectively. All the missed abnormalities were around the base of the brain. The most commonly overdiagnosed abnormality was diffuse cerebral oedema.

Conclusions: Emergency physicians should not interpret CT scans for trauma without extra training.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: Approval was obtained from the local Research Ethics Committee and Research and Development Department.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
 This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EMJ.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for EMJ. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.