Article Text

PDF
Low-impact scenarios may account for two-thirds of blunt traumatic aortic rupture
  1. P Sastry1,
  2. M Field1,
  3. R Cuerden2,
  4. D Richens3
  1. 1The Cardiothoracic Centre, Liverpool, UK
  2. 2Transport Research Laboratory, Crawthorne, Berkshire, UK
  3. 3Trent Cardiac Centre, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to P Sastry, The Cardiothoracic Centre, Thomas Drive, Liverpool, UK; drsastry{at}doctors.net.uk

Abstract

Background Traditionally, blunt traumatic aortic rupture (BTAR) is thought to be a high-velocity injury. It was hypothesised that BTAR has a higher than suspected incidence in low-speed accidents, with unique kinematic and demographic risk factors.

Methods Using the UK Cooperative Crash Injury Study (CCIS) framework, impact profiling was undertaken for accidents involving BTAR. Equivalence Test Speed (ETS) was the parameter used to compare crash severity within comparable impact configurations, as it is a surrogate marker reflecting the net impact forces acting on the vehicle. ETS=40 mph (the threshold used for safety testing within the EURONCAP scheme) was used to delineate low-impact blunt traumatic aortic rupture (LIBTAR) cases, which were subsequently analysed for aetiological risk factors.

Results 119 fully analysed cases of aortic injury were identified from a total of 16 444 cases reported to the UK CCIS between 1998 and 2007. 79 cases (66.4%) qualified as LIBTAR. Risk factors for LIBTAR were age >60 (p<0.0001), lateral impact direction (OR 2.041, RR 1.99, p=0.003), and struck side seat position (OR 1.934, RR 1.885 p=0.101). Low-impact crash scenarios were found to represent more than 95% of UK road traffic accidents.

Conclusion Low-impact collisions account for two thirds of fatal aortic injuries. Age >60, lateral impacts and struck side seat position are predictive of LIBTAR. Low-impact cases were associated with minor (potentially subclinical) intimomedial injuries. Therefore, it is recommended that a higher index of suspicion of aortic injury is used in low-impact scenarios in the risk groups identified.

  • Accident prevention
  • aorta
  • cardiac care, rupture
  • trauma

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Primary survey
    Simon Carley