Article Text

PDF
Risk stratification of patients with acute chest pain without a rise in troponin: current practice in England
  1. Mark Dunham1,
  2. Kirsty Challen2,
  3. Darren Walter3
  1. 1Specialty Registrar in Anaesthesia, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
  2. 2Specialty Registrar in Emergency Medicine, North West Deanery, Manchester, UK
  3. 3Consultant in Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mark Dunham, Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane,Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK; mark_dunham2000{at}hotmail.com

Abstract

Background Patients presenting with acute chest pain without a rise in cardiac troponins are considered to be at low risk of adverse cardiac events and are often considered for early discharge without further inpatient investigation. However, there is evidence that this commonly encountered patient group has a significant rate of early acute myocardial infarction and death.

Objective To assess current practice in the risk stratification of patients presenting with acute chest pain to emergency departments (EDs) in England who do not develop a rise in cardiac markers.

Methods A postal survey was sent to all 193 EDs. This contained 21 questions related to the assessment of patients presenting with acute chest pain.

Results 141 EDs returned completed questionnaires. 27% of responding departments routinely used objective clinical risk scoring as part of their risk stratification. Less than 16% carried out exercise stress testing on the majority of patients prior to discharge from hospital.

Conclusions The use of troponin as a diagnostic test and risk stratification tool appears to be used universally in England. However, the further risk stratification of patients presenting with acute chest pain without a rise in cardiac troponin is inconsistent.

  • Chest pain
  • acute coronary syndrome
  • risk stratification
  • cardiac care
  • cardiac care, acute coronary syndrome
  • emergency care systems
  • wounds, assessment

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.