rss
Emerg Med J 28:945-947 doi:10.1136/emj.2009.086397
  • Original article

Which improvements could prevent the departure of the left-without-being-seen patients?

  1. Nicolas Simon
  1. Emergency Department, Poissy Hospital, Yvelines, France
  1. Correspondence to Dr Gladys Ibanez, 90 rue Jean Pierre Timbaud, 75011 Paris, France; gladys.ibanez{at}upmc.fr
  1. Contributors IG, GL and SN conceived and designed the study, contributed to the development of the telephone questionnaire and contributed substantially to its revision. IG conducted the telephone survey, analysed the data, drafted the manuscript and takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. GL and SN supervised IG in the conduct of the trial and data collection.

  • Accepted 5 September 2010
  • Published Online First 20 October 2010

Abstract

Objectives To determine which measures, other than a reduction in waiting time, could prevent the departure of the left-without-being-seen (LWBS) patients in an emergency department. Secondary objectives were description of the characteristics of LWBS patients, analysis of their reasons for leaving and assessment of their medical outcome.

Methods A feasibility study was used to establish a telephone survey form. A prospective study of 421 patients was then carried out between 23 November 2006 and 12 February 2007 in the Poissy emergency department. Every LWBS patient whose telephone number was available in the administrative file was included. Patients who could not be contacted within 7 days after their departure were excluded. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA 8.0 software.

Results 12 702 patients were admitted to the emergency department, of whom 421 (3.3%) (95% CI 0.030 to 0.036) left without being seen by a physician. 229 patients (54%) agreed to respond to the survey. 56% of the LWBS patients informed the medical team that they were leaving the emergency department. 74% of the surveyed participants suggested measures that could have helped them wait longer. These measures can be separated into two main categories: an improvement in communication and an improvement in the comfort of the emergency department waiting room.

Conclusion The ‘quality’ of the waiting time appears to be important in the decision to leave. If this aspect was taken into account, a reduction in the number of LWBS patients and improved quality of care could be achieved in emergency departments.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the National Committee for Information Technology and Liberty (CNIL), France.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Responses to this article

Relevant Article

Blogs and podcasts

Blogs and podcasts

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EMJ.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.