rss
Emerg Med J 29:1 doi:10.1136/emermed-2011-200968
  • Primary survey

Highlights from this issue

  1. Ian K Maconochie, Deputy Editor

Firearms figures—is life getting more dangerous?

This retrospective study has data on firearm injuries from the Traumatic Audit and Research Network (which includes in-hospital deaths and severely injured patients) matched with data from the Office for National Surveys which provides information on prehospital and hospital deaths from 1990 to 2007/8 (see page 10). While US data have shown an increase in deaths over time, there has so far been a lack of information to inform the veracity of UK media speculation of increasing morbidity and mortality. This paper suggests that there are significant regional differences relating to age and that there are gender-related risks of death. These outcomes vary depending on whether or not the firearm injuries are self-inflicted or the result of being assaulted (eg, young men attend hospitals more commonly with assaults). The authors discuss the injury prevention and training implications of the data.

Can ultrasound help to solve the LRTI?

If the thoracic CT scan is the ‘gold standard’ for diagnosing pneumonia, then positive chest x-rays provide agreement for only 65% of cases (see page …

Relevant Articles


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EMJ.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Poll now closed

What impact do you think co-locating primary care services with or within EDs has on ED visits:

Results:
Decreased ED visits: 55% Increased ED visits: 28% Has no effect: 17%

Related review: Primary care services located with EDs: a review of effectiveness >>

Related editorial: Primary care services located with EDs: a review of effectiveness >>

Navigate This Article