Background Medical simulation has been used to teach critical illness in a variety of settings. This study examined the effect of didactic lectures compared with simulated case scenario in a medical simulation course on the early management of severe sepsis.
Methods A prospective multicentre randomised study was performed enrolling resident physicians in emergency medicine from four hospitals in Asia. Participants were randomly assigned to a course that included didactic lectures followed by a skills workshop and simulated case scenario (lecture-first) or to a course that included a skills workshop and simulated case scenario followed by didactic lectures (simulation-first). A pre-test was given to the participants at the beginning of the course, post-test 1 was given after the didactic lectures or simulated case scenario depending on the study group assignment, then a final post-test 2 was given at the end of the course. Performance on the simulated case scenario was evaluated with a performance task checklist.
Results 98 participants were enrolled in the study. Post-test 2 scores were significantly higher than pre-test scores in all participants (80.8±12.0% vs 65.4±12.2%, p<0.01). There was no difference in pre-test scores between the two study groups. The lecture-first group had significantly higher post-test 1 scores than the simulation-first group (78.8±10.6% vs 71.6±12.6%, p<0.01). There was no difference in post-test 2 scores between the two groups. The simulated case scenario task performance completion was 90.8% (95% CI 86.6% to 95.0%) in the lecture-first group compared with 83.8% (95% CI 79.5% to 88.1%) in the simulation-first group (p=0.02).
Conclusions A medical simulation course can improve resident physician knowledge in the early management of severe sepsis. Such a course should include a comprehensive curriculum that includes didactic lectures followed by simulation experience.
- intensive care
- infectious diseases
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Funding This work was supported by Edwards Lifesciences, Asia Pacific, Singapore in the form of administrative support and travel funding for the investigators to perform the study at the participating medical simulation centres. Edwards Lifesciences did not contribute to the design of the study nor the decision to submit this manuscript for publication.
Competing interests HBN has received funding from Edwards Lifesciences to develop the medical simulation course given to the participants in the study.
Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by Loma Linda University Institutional Review Board.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.