Article Text

PDF
Can lightweight rescuers adequately perform CPR according to 2010 resuscitation guideline requirements?
  1. Asta Krikscionaitiene1,
  2. Kestutis Stasaitis1,
  3. Milda Dambrauskiene2,
  4. Zilvinas Dambrauskas3,
  5. Egle Vaitkaitiene4,
  6. Paulius Dobozinskas1,
  7. Dinas Vaitkaitis1
  1. 1Crises Research Centre, Department of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  2. 2Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  3. 3Department of Surgery, Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology, Institute for Digestive Research Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  4. 4Department of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  1. Correspondence to Dr Zilvinas Dambrauskas, Department of Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu 2, Kaunas LT-50009, Lithuania; zilvinas.dambrauskas{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Aim To evaluate associations between rescuers' anthropometric characteristics and chest compressions (CC) depth according to 2010 resuscitation guidelines.

Methods 186 medical and pharmacy students, never trained in basic life support (BLS) before, underwent video self-instruction training. The participants were asked to perform a BLS test on a manikin connected to a PC for 6 min immediately after training, and the quality of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills was evaluated.

Results Women with body weights less than 56 kg were 6.29 times more likely to produce insufficient CCs than women weighing 56–62.7 kg, and 4.72 times more likely to produce insufficient CCs compared with women weighing more than 62.7 kg.

Conclusions Lightweight rescuers may have difficulty achieving the full compression depth of 5–6 cm required by new resuscitation guidelines. These rescuers require special attention during CPR training, with an emphasis on correct body positioning and use of body weight for CCs.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee based at Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (Protocol No. BC-MF-188/2011).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.