Article Text

PDF
Secondary triage in prehospital emergency ambulance services: a systematic review
  1. Kathryn Eastwood1,2,3,
  2. Amee Morgans3,
  3. Karen Smith1,2,
  4. Johannes Stoelwinder1,2
  1. 1Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, The Alfred Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  2. 2Ambulance Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  3. 3Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Kathryn Eastwood, Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, The Alfred Centre, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; Kathryn.Eastwood{at}monash.edu

Abstract

Objective Secondary telephone triage to divert low-acuity patients to alternative non-ambulance services before ambulance arrival has been trialled in the UK and USA as a management strategy to cope with the increase in ambulance demand. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the literature on the structure, safety and success of secondary triage systems.

Methods For inclusion in the study, the telephone triage system had to be a secondary process, receiving referred patients who had already been categorised as low priority by a primary triage process. Two independent reviewers conducted the search to identify relevant studies. Six articles and one report were identified.

Results The major theme of the papers was the safety and accuracy of secondary telephone triage in identifying low-acuity patients. Two studies also discussed patient satisfaction. There was a low incidence of adverse events, as expected as these patients had already been subjected to primary telephone triage. In the studies identifying ambulance dispatch as a potential final disposition, at least half of the patients were diverted away from ambulance dispatch. In the studies that identified self/home care as a final disposition, a maximum of 31% of patients were categorised to this outcome. Otherwise all patients were recommended for assessment by a healthcare professional other than ambulance clinicians. Patients appeared to be satisfied with secondary telephone triage on follow-up.

Conclusions These results suggest that, while secondary triage of these patients is safe, further research is required to determine its most appropriate structure and its effect on ambulance demand.

  • Triage
  • Telephone
  • Emergency medical service communication systems
  • Ambulance

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.