Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Mixed methods research: a design for emergency care research?
  1. Simon Cooper1,
  2. Jo Porter1,
  3. Ruth Endacott2
  1. 1Monash University, School of Nursing (Gippsland), Churchill, Victoria, Australia
  2. 2School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
  1. Correspondence to Simon Cooper, Monash University, School of Nursing (Gippsland), Churchill, Victoria 3820, Australia; simon.cooper{at}med.monash.edu.au

Abstract

This paper follows previous publications on generic qualitative approaches, qualitative designs and action research in emergency care by this group of authors. Contemporary views on mixed methods approaches are considered, with a particular focus on the design choice and the amalgamation of qualitative and quantitative data emphasising the timing of data collection for each approach, their relative ‘weight’ and how they will be mixed. Mixed methods studies in emergency care are reviewed before the variety of methodological approaches and best practice considerations are presented. The use of mixed methods in clinical studies is increasing, aiming to answer questions such as ‘how many’ and ‘why’ in the same study, and as such are an important and useful approach to many key questions in emergency care.

  • Emergency
  • research
  • mixed methods
  • clinical assessment
  • education
  • emergency care systems
  • nursing
  • emergency departments
  • wounds
  • research
  • Accepted 4 June 2010

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Primary survey
    Simon Carley