Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Learner's evaluation in paediatric intensive care unit
  1. Javed I Akhtar1,
  2. Jose Irazuzta1,
  3. Aimin Chen2
  1. 1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, University of Florida, Jacksonville/Wolfson Children's Hospital, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
  2. 2Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Javed I Akhtar, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, 800 Prudential Drive, WCH/3rd Floor, Jacksonville, FL 32207, USA; jiakhtar{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Objective To compare post-paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) rotation performance of paediatric residents (PGY-2) and emergency residents (PGY-2) on an online test developed by the subcommittee of the paediatric section of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Also, to compare residents' performance with that of physician extenders.

Design and Settings A single centre, longitudinal, retrospective, quality improvement data review in a tertiary care, 20-bed PICU. The test was securely submitted to all residents at the end of their PICU rotation from July 2005 to June 2008. The test was also submitted to physician extenders once only during the 3-year study period.

Results The mean, paediatric residents' (N=30) score was 77.3%±10.8 (SD) and that of emergency residents (N=40) was 82.3%±8.2 (SD) at PGY-2 level (p=0.03). The combined paediatric residents' and emergency residents' mean score was 80.1%±9.7 (SD). The mean physician extenders' (N=7) score was 80.1%±6.5 (SD).

Conclusion Emergency residents performed slightly better than paediatric residents on the paediatric-focused knowledge-based online test. The physician extenders' performance was comparable to the individual resident groups' performance and their combined performance.

  • Assessment
  • education
  • emergency ambulance systems
  • emergency resident
  • intensive care
  • paediatric intensive care unit
  • paediatric resident
  • physician extender
  • society of critical care medicine

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Primary survey
    Ian K Maconochie