Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Is the current South African emergency medicine curriculum fit for purpose? An emergency medicine practice analysis
  1. Kirsten L Cohen,
  2. Lee A Wallis
  1. Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town & Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
  1. Correspondence to Dr Kirsten L Cohen, 302 Sheraton, St Andrews Road, Seapoint 8005, Cape town, South Africa; kirstenlcohen{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Background The aim of this study was to determine whether the current South African Emergency Medicine Curriculum is appropriate for the burden of disease seen by registrars in Cape Town Emergency Centres.

Method This is a cross-sectional retrospective audit of patients presenting to a range of secondary level emergency centres (ECs) in Cape Town. The type of clinical presentations, investigations done and procedures performed were analysed. Basic descriptive statistics are presented.

Results A total of 1283 clinical presentations from three secondary level ECs in Cape Town were collated. Of these clinical presentations, 47 were not included in the South African Emergency Medicine curriculum; in addition, two were only included in the paediatrics section. 115 procedures were tabled, of these, 11 were not included in the curriculum. 730 investigations were tabled; 527 were not included in the curriculum.

Conclusions The curriculum did not cover all the clinical conditions, procedures and investigations encountered by emergency medicine (EM) registrars in Cape Town. In addition, there were multiple categories in the curriculum that were not encountered in EM practice at all. The investigations section of the curriculum correlated particularly poorly with the skills needed for the burden of disease seen in ECs in Cape Town. The curriculum should be redrafted guided by a practice analysis of EM.

  • Curriculum
  • post graduate education
  • emergency medicine
  • scope of practice
  • practice analysis, education
  • teaching
  • emergency care systems
  • emergency departments

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This was granted by the University of Cape Town Ethics Committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.