Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Effect of an onboard event recorder and a formal review process on ambulance driving behaviour
  1. Lucas A Myers1,
  2. Christopher S Russi2,
  3. Matt D Will1,
  4. Daniel G Hankins2
  1. 1Gold Cross Ambulance, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  2. 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  1. Correspondence to Lucas A Myers, 501 6th Ave. NW, Rochester, MN 55901, USA; myers.lucas3{at}mayo.edu

Abstract

Background Onboard event recorders in vehicles record external and internal video before and after when preset g-force limits are exceeded. The use of these recorders in a fleet of ambulances, along with formal review, may decrease the number of unsafe driving events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the number of driving events since the inception of DriveCam technology in a fleet.

Methods 54 vehicles were outfitted with DriveCam event recorders in 2003. Events were captured and assigned a categorical severity score of 1–4 (1 being the lowest severity) when the vehicle exceeded preset g-force limits. An event was assigned a score of ‘good’ if the review determined that the driver demonstrated good judgement. A review and feedback process was implemented in August 2006 and analysed through June 2008.

Results During the study period, 2 979 891 miles were driven for 115 019 ambulance responses, with 6009 events captured. Events were categorised as follows: 2008 (33.4%) level 1; 3726 (62.0%) level 2; 175 (2.9%) level 3; 3 (0.05%) level 4; and 97 (1.6%) good events. The proportion of all events per mile and all events per response decreased over time with use of the recorder and review and feedback.

Conclusions The institution of video event recorder technology along with formal review and feedback resulted in a change in driving behaviour. Given that call volumes increased and driving events decreased, these measures may serve as surrogates for improvements in safety and maintenance costs. Economic analysis is necessary for conclusions on fiscal impact.

  • Ambulance driving
  • camera
  • paramedic
  • emergency ambulance systems
  • prehospital care

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

  • Presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Emergency Medicine Physicians (NAEMP), Jacksonville, Florida, 22–24 January 2009.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Mayo Clinic IRB deemed this project exempt.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Primary survey
    Darren Walter