Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Knowledge of radiation exposure in common radiological investigations: a comparison between radiologists and non-radiologists
  1. Ryan K L Lee1,
  2. Winnie C W Chu1,
  3. Colin A Graham2,3,
  4. Timothy H Rainer2,3,
  5. Anil T Ahuja
  1. 1Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  2. 2Trauma and Emergency Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China
  3. 3Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  1. Correspondence to Professor Colin A Graham, Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Trauma and Emergency Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China; leekalok2909{at}yahoo.com.hk

Abstract

Background Radiological examinations are commonly requested for patients to aid clinical diagnosis. However, many doctors do not realise how much radiation dosage their patients are exposed to during radiological investigations. This study aims to assess and compare the knowledge of radiologists and non-radiologists about radiation doses of common radiological investigations.

Methods A prospective questionnaire study of doctors about the dosage of commonly performed radiological investigations in a university teaching hospital in Hong Kong. Participants were asked to indicate the average dose of radiation (in mSv) for a standard chest x-ray exposure. Doctors were then asked to estimate the doses of radiation (measured in chest x-ray equivalents) for various radiological procedures. The results of radiologists and non-radiologists were compared.

Results 158 doctors (25 radiologists and 133 non-radiologists) completed the questionnaire. The overall accuracy was 40% for radiologists and 16% for non-radiologists. One-third of non-radiologists could not distinguish radiological examinations with or without ionising radiation. No non-radiologists correctly stated the radiation dose (in mSv) of a conventional chest x-ray, and 77% underestimated the dose of radiological examinations. For radiologists, only 32% were correct for the radiation dose of a conventional chest x-ray while 7% underestimated the radiation doses.

Conclusion Knowledge of radiation doses of investigation is generally inadequate among radiologists, and particularly poor in non-radiologists. Underestimation of radiation doses may expose patients to increasing radiological investigation and exposure to radiation hazards. Awareness of the radiation hazard of radiological examinations should be raised among medical professionals.

  • Trauma

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study received institutional review board approval.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Primary survey
    Kevin Mackway-Jones