Objective To improve the Manchester Triage System (MTS) in paediatric emergency care.
Methods The authors performed a prospective observational study at the emergency departments of a university and teaching hospital in The Netherlands and included children attending in 2007 and 2008. The authors developed and implemented specific age-dependent modifications for the MTS, based on patient groups where the system's performance was low. Nurses applied the modified system in 11 481 (84%) patients. The reference standard for urgency defined five levels based on a combination of vital signs at presentation, potentially life-threatening conditions, diagnostic resources, therapeutic interventions and follow-up. The reference standard for urgency was previously defined and available in 11 260/11 481 (96%) patients.
Results Compared with the original MTS specificity improved from 79% (95% CI 79% to 80%) to 87% (95% CI 86% to 87%) while sensitivity remained similar ((63%, 95% CI 59% to 66%) vs (64%, 95% CI 60% to 68%)). The diagnostic OR increased (4.1 vs 11).
Conclusions Modifications of the MTS for paediatric emergency care resulted in an improved specificity while sensitivity remained unchanged. Further research should focus on the improvement of sensitivity.
- emergency medical services
- emergency department
- paediatric emergency medicine
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Study design Prospective observational study.
Online appendix Reference classification parameters, matrix and definitions of reference urgency categories.
Funding Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) and Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands. None of the granting agencies listed had any role in the design and conduct of the interpretation of the data or preparation, review or approval of the manuscript.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval The ethics approval was provided by the Institutional medical ethics committee; the requirement for informed consent was waived.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.